Illinois Prison Talk
News:
Welcome to ILLINOIS PRISON TALK,  www.illinoisprisontalk.org -  A Family Support Forum and Information Center for those interacting with the Illinois Department of Corrections.  IPT members are comprised of family/friends of inmates, prison reform activists, ex-offenders, prisoner rights advocates and others interested in the well-being of Illinois prisoners. We encourage open discussion but please be tolerant of other's opinions.   This website is protected by Copyright © 2006-2014.  All rights reserved. There are some private forums that require registration, please register.
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 19, 2014, 07:04:59 AM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 »  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 50%, 85%, or 100% Sentencing Guidelines Chart  (Read 37818 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Dazzler
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 352
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 22815

Retired News Reporter ~ Prison Reform Advocate


WWW
« on: March 09, 2007, 01:22:13 PM »

We receive many questions about 50, 85 and 100%  truth in sentencing guidelines.  Our attorney member smfchicago has supplied this information.  The crimes and the dates the Truth in Sentencing took effect follow each listing.  Some classes X's receive 50% sentences, that is, day for a day good time:  

Here is her reply about TIS:

Hello -

Technically, TIS is not applicable to all violent felonies; that is a misunderstanding of the law. It is applicable to certain enumerated offenses, including many violent felonies.

First, you have to figure out if the crime falls under the truth in sentencing statute, and if so, whether it is subject to 85% or 100%. Second, if the date of the offense, not the date of conviction or sentencing, is on or after June 19, 1998, your guy is subject to truth in sentencing, IF it is one of the enumerated offenses.

If he committed the crime prior to June 19, 1998, he gets day for day good time, regardless of whether the classification of crime is subject to truth in sentencing.

Second degree murder is not subject to truth in sentencing, although other crimes we may not think of as "violent" per se, such as reckless homicide, aka drunk driving that results in death of someone, are.

Finally, it is in fact true that sometimes prisoners know more about the law than law enforcement and attorneys. I am an attorney and often rely on prisoners who have meticulously studied the law to help me or explain to me theories or statutes that may sometimes be difficult to figure out.

I am attaching a chart breaking down the enumerated TIS offenses and their corresponding rate.

Smf






Truth-in-Sentencing (TIS):  Offenses, Amount of Sentence, and Effective Dates

Offense   TIS   Offense Committed on or After:
First Degree Murder   100 %   6/19/98
Terrorism   100%   6/19/98
Attempt First Degree Murder   85%   6/19/98
Solicitation of Murder   85%   6/19/98
Solicitation of Murder for Hire   85%   6/19/98
Intentional Homicide of an Unborn Child   85%   6/19/98
Predatory Criminal Sexual Assault of a Child (under age 13)   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Criminal Sexual Assault   85%   6/19/98
Criminal Sexual Assault (includes, but not limited to children at least 13 but under18)   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Kidnapping   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Battery with a Firearm   85%   6/19/98
Heinous Battery   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Battery of a Senior Citizen (60 or older)   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Battery of a Child (under age 13)   85%   6/19/98
Home Invasion + GBH# GBH = Great bodily harm#   85%   6/19/98
Armed Robbery + GBH   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Vehicular Hijacking + GBH   85%   6/19/98
Aggravated Discharge of a Firearm + GBH   85%   6/19/98
Armed Violence with a Category 1 or Category 2 Weapon + GBH   85%   6/19/98
Reckless Homicide, under 9-3(e)   85%   7/15/99
Aggravated Driving Under the Influence of Drugs or Alcohol   85%   7/15/99
Aggravated Battery with a Machine Gun with a Silencer or  Aggravated Battery with a Firearm with a Silencer   85%   7/15/99
Aggravated Arson   85%   7/27/01
Logged

~ "I have visited some of the best and the worst prisons and have never seen signs of coddling, but I have seen the terrible results of the boredom and frustration of empty hours and pointless existence." ~ US Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger

~ "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
wifey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 42
Offline Offline

Posts: 746


« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2007, 12:59:40 PM »

I still am not clear on this.  Does this mean that there is NO time off for the 85% sentences?  I thought that I read a statute here somewhere that if you were convicted of a crime that falls in this category, there is a 4.5 day/month good time credit.  Am I ready this correctly?
Logged
downtownchicago
Banned
Full member
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 54


« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2007, 01:27:36 PM »

The 4.5 days/month credit produces the 85%.    WIth 4.5 days credited each month and presuming 30 days in a month, the inmate will only do 25.5 days each month.  25.5/30 = 85%
Logged
Scout
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 273
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 5611


« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2007, 01:44:56 PM »

On a four year sentence, at 85% the inmate serves approximately 3-1/2 years.  If the sentences are consecutive, he'll serve that time for each sentence, less any extra good time.
Logged

Together, we CAN make a difference


It's difficult to have a battle of wits with unarmed individuals.
TinkerBella
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 43
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: chicago
Posts: 611


« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2007, 10:15:10 PM »

I also believe that 85 % cases are only able to get the 3monthes Meritorious goodtime, their not eligible for any other good time credits.
Logged

Imagine the impossible? Demand the Impressionable! The Resolution is in-destructable ! WE ARE INEVITABLE!!!
Scout
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 273
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 5611


« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2007, 05:34:20 AM »

85% cases are not eligible for MGT, unfortunately.  This is what our attorney member smfchicago explains on good time:

There are four types of statutory credit elgibile inmates can get.

1.  SGT or Statutory Good Time: that's day for day for all non TIS prisoners, and 4.5 for every month for TIS guys at 85%.

2.  MGT or meritorious good time: 180 days up to director's discretion.  However, certain offenses (most of the TIS offenses and then some) are only eligible for 90 days worth of MGT (this applies to people who were sentenced to what are now TIS crimes, but because they are under the old law, are still eligible for good time).  Current TIS prisoners are ineligible for ANY MGT.

3.  EGCC or Earned Good Conduct Credit: this is what you get for participating in substance abuse programs, having a job in Correctional industry or going to school. You get 1.25  x whatever SGT you get upon completion of the program if you participate in the program before 8/1/1993; after that, multiply your SGT by 1.5.  TIS guys are ineligible, as are people sentenced to EHM, boot camp or someone who has had a prior felony conviction in an adult prison.

4.  GED Good time: This is fairly new, and has the same limits as EGCC - gives an inmate who completes his or her GED in prison and additional 60 days of good time credit. Prisoners must receive his or GED while incarcerated in order to get the 60 days credit.

TIS = Truth in Sentencing which went into effect in 1998.
Logged

Together, we CAN make a difference


It's difficult to have a battle of wits with unarmed individuals.
smfchicago
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 131
Offline Offline

Posts: 660


« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2007, 10:48:59 AM »

SCout & Kim are both right:

If you are convicted of an offense that is now a TIS offense, but you committed the crime prior to June 19, 1998, you are elgible for only 90 days of MGT. If you committed a crime that is now TIS crime, you are ineligible for any mgt.

Logged
downtownchicago
Banned
Full member
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 54


« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2007, 02:20:00 PM »

I hate that GED credit.  It's very unfair !  An inmate shouldn't be punished because he was incarcerated after getting his HS diploma or GED.  There should be an equitable alternative for those inmates.
Logged
JDsMom
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 31
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Le Roy, IL
Posts: 1177


« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2007, 02:28:28 PM »

Has anyone heard any rumors, stories about the Gov. signing some new sentencing laws ?????? There's talk going around Pinkneyville about it, and was curious if it is true or just one of those rumors that seem to float around the cellblocks LOL
Logged

Handle every stressful situation like a dog.
If you can't eat it or play with it, just pee on it and walk away.
RicosChica
Jr. member
**

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2007, 02:50:16 PM »

Hello there. this good time is really confusnig. can someone explain something to me.
my boy got day for day on a 23 year sentence.
the idoc says custody date of 01-04-1998 (at the bottom) "sentencing"
however above that says it began 12-28-1998/ i have no idea how long he was in county. (11 month difference)
his out date said 07-04-2009.  
they awarded him good time credit (90 days) so it now says 04-04-09.

where would they apply the 6 months to? does this mean he gets out 10/04/08
and in the 11 months he was fighting his case jan to dec 1998 does he get full credit for that as well. (county time)

he told me the idoc dates are wrong. i'm trying to figure out when to expect this boy.
would springfield have actual information?
thank you!!!!!!
Logged
Dazzler
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 352
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 22815

Retired News Reporter ~ Prison Reform Advocate


WWW
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2007, 04:45:33 PM »

Yes, it is confusing and the IDOC doesn't keep their information up to date on out dates....they add the good time when they feel like it...

His time spent in county should be deducted from his sentence....Here's how to come up with an approximate out date.  Divide his 23 years in half.  If he didn't lose any time for tickets or have any good time taken away you can then subtract another six months for good conduct.  If the 90 days you mention is for schooling or programs then deduct that also.  If its just for good time credit than that is part of the overall six months that will be awarded.  His county time should be deducted also.  That is usually deducted by the IDOC during reception...if it hasn't been then contact Springfield.  I figure his release date is July 4, 08 - minus whatever county time he did....if he did in fact spend 11 months in County he should have been released last month. 
Logged

~ "I have visited some of the best and the worst prisons and have never seen signs of coddling, but I have seen the terrible results of the boredom and frustration of empty hours and pointless existence." ~ US Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger

~ "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
foreverurs07
Full member
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 337


« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2007, 09:18:48 AM »

My guy was charged with armed robbery and he is sentenced to 6 years. They said that he is going to serve 2 1/2 of the 6 years. Is he eligible for any good time. I really don't understand how any of it works. Can anyone help me?
Logged

You and me together through the days and nights...I don't worry cuz everything's gonna be alright!!



Dazzler
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 352
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 22815

Retired News Reporter ~ Prison Reform Advocate


WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2007, 09:28:37 AM »

Welcome to IPT.  Your guy seems to already have his good time figured.  Good Time is the day for a day he will serve.  A six year sentence is eligible for 1/2 off and an additional six months for overcrowding.  As long as he doesn't receive any disciplinary charges and loss of time he should be out in the 2 1/2 years.  I'm not sure if he'd be eligible for school/program credit.  Usually any violent crime is not eligible. 
Logged

~ "I have visited some of the best and the worst prisons and have never seen signs of coddling, but I have seen the terrible results of the boredom and frustration of empty hours and pointless existence." ~ US Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger

~ "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
wifey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 42
Offline Offline

Posts: 746


« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2007, 04:56:34 PM »

My h's IDOC site says that he was brought in on March of 2007 but he had served in a county jail since Dec. of 2006.  They have his out date as 2/30/2034.  Since when does February have 30 days?  Is his county time taken off as time served?
Logged
Dazzler
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 352
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 22815

Retired News Reporter ~ Prison Reform Advocate


WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2007, 05:05:15 PM »

We're talking about the IDOC here wifey...LOL..not brain surgeons...I'll bet there are many employees who think February has 30 days....LOL   So does this mean he'll never get out?  That's like having a b'day on the 29th in Leap Year.  Hopefully someone will catch it and change the date...or you could send an email and ask them what's up with their figuring...LOL

The judge should have ordered his county time deducted as time served...but they don't HAVE to....you'd have to see his sentencing papers...
Logged

~ "I have visited some of the best and the worst prisons and have never seen signs of coddling, but I have seen the terrible results of the boredom and frustration of empty hours and pointless existence." ~ US Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger

~ "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
Scout
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 273
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 5611


« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2007, 05:14:07 PM »

His county time should automatically be deducted..if he's not getting credit for it, a motion needs to go before the judge.  By law, any time served pre-trial is counted towards the sentence.
Logged

Together, we CAN make a difference


It's difficult to have a battle of wits with unarmed individuals.
Dazzler
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 352
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 22815

Retired News Reporter ~ Prison Reform Advocate


WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2007, 05:18:36 PM »

You mean I'm wrong Scout...???? fait   :-D
Logged

~ "I have visited some of the best and the worst prisons and have never seen signs of coddling, but I have seen the terrible results of the boredom and frustration of empty hours and pointless existence." ~ US Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger

~ "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
Scout
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 273
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 5611


« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2007, 05:23:18 PM »

LOL, I wasn't gonna go there. :)

I believe it's even written in the statutes somewhere...
Logged

Together, we CAN make a difference


It's difficult to have a battle of wits with unarmed individuals.
wifey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 42
Offline Offline

Posts: 746


« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2007, 08:00:49 AM »

My h. says that the sentencing papers which he has an I have never seen, do state that he got credit for time served as well as the time he was taken into custody before we posted bond.  Thanks scout!  Dazzler, I know what you mean about IDOC. What a goofy system!  I don't trust that all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed on any legal documents.  I am like a fly on s**t when it comes to making sure that all the details are taken care of!!!
Logged
Dazzler
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 352
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 22815

Retired News Reporter ~ Prison Reform Advocate


WWW
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2007, 09:29:30 AM »

Damn, I hate being wrong....so I did some research.  This is all I found about time-served from the Unified Code of Corrections in the Illinois Statutes, regarding sentencing  (Scroll near the bottom):

HB2478 Enrolled                      LRB093 02439 RLC 02447 b

    AN ACT in relation to criminal law.

    Be it enacted by the People of  the  State  of  Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:

    Section  5. The Unified Code of Corrections is amended by
changing Section 5-4-1 as follows:

    (730 ILCS 5/5-4-1) (from Ch. 38, par. 1005-4-1)
    Sec. 5-4-1.  Sentencing Hearing.
    (a)  Except  when  the  death  penalty  is  sought  under
hearing procedures otherwise specified, after a determination
of guilt, a hearing shall be held  to  impose  the  sentence.
However, prior to the imposition of sentence on an individual
being  sentenced  for  an  offense  based upon a charge for a
violation of Section 11-501 of the Illinois Vehicle Code or a
similar provision of a local ordinance, the  individual  must
undergo  a professional evaluation to determine if an alcohol
or other drug abuse problem exists and the extent of  such  a
problem.   Programs  conducting  these  evaluations  shall be
licensed by the Department of Human  Services.   However,  if
the  individual is not a resident of Illinois, the court may,
in its discretion, accept an evaluation from a program in the
state of such individual's residence. The court  may  in  its
sentencing  order approve an eligible defendant for placement
in a Department of Corrections impact  incarceration  program
as  provided  in  Section 5-8-1.1 or 5-8-1.3.  At the hearing
the court shall:
         (1)  consider the evidence, if  any,  received  upon
    the trial;
         (2)  consider any presentence reports;
         (3)  consider  the financial impact of incarceration
    based on the financial impact statement  filed  with  the
    clerk of the court by the Department of Corrections;
         (4)  consider  evidence  and  information offered by
    the parties in aggravation and mitigation;
         (5)  hear arguments as to sentencing alternatives;
         (6)  afford the defendant the opportunity to make  a
    statement in his own behalf;
         (7)  afford  the  victim  of  a  violent  crime or a
    violation of Section 11-501 of the Illinois Vehicle Code,
    or a  similar  provision  of  a  local  ordinance,  or  a
    qualified  individual  affected  by:   (i) a violation of
    Section  405,  405.1,  405.2,  or  407  of  the  Illinois
    Controlled Substances Act,  or  (ii)  a  Class  4  felony
    violation of Section 11-14, 11-15, 11-17, 11-18, 11-18.1,
    or  11-19  of the Criminal Code of 1961, committed by the
    defendant the opportunity to make a statement  concerning
    the  impact  on  the  victim  and  to  offer  evidence in
    aggravation or mitigation; provided  that  the  statement
    and  evidence  offered  in aggravation or mitigation must
    first be prepared in  writing  in  conjunction  with  the
    State's Attorney before it may be presented orally at the
    hearing.  Any  sworn  testimony  offered by the victim is
    subject to the defendant's right  to  cross-examine.  All
    statements  and evidence offered under this paragraph (7)
    shall become part of the record of the  court.   For  the
    purpose  of  this  paragraph  (7), "qualified individual"
    means any person who  (i)  lived  or  worked  within  the
    territorial  jurisdiction  where  the  offense took place
    when the offense took place; and (ii)  is  familiar  with
    various public places within the territorial jurisdiction
    where the offense took place when the offense took place.
    For  the  purposes  of  this  paragraph  (7),  "qualified
    individual"  includes any peace officer, or any member of
    any duly organized State, county, or municipal peace unit
    assigned  to  the  territorial  jurisdiction  where   the
    offense took place when the offense took place; and
         (8)  in   cases  of  reckless  homicide  afford  the
    victim's spouse, guardians, parents  or  other  immediate
    family members an opportunity to make oral statements.
    (b)  All  sentences  shall  be imposed by the judge based
upon his independent assessment  of  the  elements  specified
above  and  any  agreement  as  to  sentence  reached  by the
parties.  The judge who presided at the trial  or  the  judge
who  accepted  the  plea  of guilty shall impose the sentence
unless he is no longer sitting as  a  judge  in  that  court.
Where  the judge does not impose sentence at the same time on
all defendants  who  are  convicted  as  a  result  of  being
involved  in  the  same offense, the defendant or the State's
Attorney may advise the sentencing court of  the  disposition
of any other defendants who have been sentenced.
    (c)  In imposing a sentence for a violent crime or for an
offense  of  operating  or  being  in  physical  control of a
vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, any other  drug
or any combination thereof, or a similar provision of a local
ordinance,  when such offense resulted in the personal injury
to someone other than the defendant, the  trial  judge  shall
specify  on  the record the particular evidence, information,
factors in mitigation and aggravation or other  reasons  that
led to his sentencing determination. The full verbatim record
of  the  sentencing  hearing shall be filed with the clerk of
the court and shall be a public record.
    (c-1)  In  imposing  a  sentence  for  the   offense   of
aggravated   kidnapping  for  ransom,  home  invasion,  armed
robbery, aggravated vehicular hijacking, aggravated discharge
of a firearm, or armed violence with a category I  weapon  or
category  II  weapon, the trial judge shall make a finding as
to whether the conduct leading to conviction for the  offense
resulted  in  great  bodily harm to a victim, and shall enter
that finding and the basis for that finding in the record.
    (c-2)  If the defendant is  sentenced  to  prison,  other
than  when  a  sentence  of  natural  life  imprisonment or a
sentence of death is imposed, at the  time  the  sentence  is
imposed the judge shall state on the record in open court the
approximate  period  of  time  the  defendant  will  serve in
custody according to the then  current  statutory  rules  and
regulations  for  early  release  found  in Section 3-6-3 and
other related provisions of this  Code.   This  statement  is
intended  solely to inform the public, has no legal effect on
the defendant's actual release, and may not be relied  on  by
the defendant on appeal.
    The  judge's statement, to be given after pronouncing the
sentence, other than when the sentence is imposed for one  of
the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(3) of Section 3-6-3,
shall include the following:
    "The purpose of this statement is to inform the public of
the  actual  period of time this defendant is likely to spend
in prison as a result of this sentence.  The actual period of
prison time served is determined by the statutes of  Illinois
as  applied  to  this  sentence by the Illinois Department of
Corrections and the Illinois Prisoner Review Board.  In  this
case,  assuming the defendant receives all of his or her good
conduct credit, the period of estimated actual custody is ...
years and ... months, less up to  180  days  additional  good
conduct  credit  for  meritorious service.  If the defendant,
because of his or her own misconduct  or  failure  to  comply
with  the  institutional  regulations, does not receive those
credits, the actual time served in  prison  will  be  longer.
The  defendant  may  also  receive an additional one-half day
good  conduct  credit  for  each  day  of  participation   in
vocational,   industry,   substance  abuse,  and  educational
programs as provided for by Illinois statute."
    When the sentence is imposed  for  one  of  the  offenses
enumerated  in  paragraph (a)(3) of Section 3-6-3, other than
when  the  sentence  is  imposed  for  one  of  the  offenses
enumerated in paragraph (a)(2) of Section 3-6-3 committed  on
or  after  June 19, 1998, and other than when the sentence is
imposed for reckless homicide as defined in subsection (e) of
Section 9-3 of the Criminal Code of 1961 if the  offense  was
committed  on  or  after January 1, 1999, and other than when
the sentence is imposed for aggravated arson if  the  offense
was  committed  on  or  after  the  effective  date  of  this
amendatory  Act  of  the  92nd  General Assembly, the judge's
statement, to be given after pronouncing the sentence,  shall
include the following:
    "The purpose of this statement is to inform the public of
the  actual  period of time this defendant is likely to spend
in prison as a result of this sentence.  The actual period of
prison time served is determined by the statutes of  Illinois
as  applied  to  this  sentence by the Illinois Department of
Corrections and the Illinois Prisoner Review Board.  In  this
case,  assuming the defendant receives all of his or her good
conduct credit, the period of estimated actual custody is ...
years and ... months, less up  to  90  days  additional  good
conduct  credit  for  meritorious service.  If the defendant,
because of his or her own misconduct  or  failure  to  comply
with  the  institutional  regulations, does not receive those
credits, the actual time served in  prison  will  be  longer.
The  defendant  may  also  receive an additional one-half day
good  conduct  credit  for  each  day  of  participation   in
vocational,   industry,   substance  abuse,  and  educational
programs as provided for by Illinois statute."
    When the sentence is imposed  for  one  of  the  offenses
enumerated  in  paragraph (a)(2) of Section 3-6-3, other than
first degree murder, and the  offense  was  committed  on  or
after  June  19,  1998,  and when the sentence is imposed for
reckless homicide as defined in subsection (e) of Section 9-3
of the Criminal Code of 1961 if the offense was committed  on
or  after  January  1, 1999, and when the sentence is imposed
for aggravated arson if the offense was committed on or after
the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 92nd General
Assembly,  the  judge's  statement,   to   be   given   after
pronouncing the sentence, shall include the following:
    "The purpose of this statement is to inform the public of
the  actual  period of time this defendant is likely to spend
in prison as a result of this sentence.  The actual period of
prison time served is determined by the statutes of  Illinois
as  applied  to  this  sentence by the Illinois Department of
Corrections and the Illinois Prisoner Review Board.  In  this
case, the defendant is entitled to no more than 4 1/2 days of
good  conduct credit for each month of his or her sentence of
imprisonment.  Therefore, this defendant will serve at  least
85%  of his or her sentence.  Assuming the defendant receives
4 1/2 days credit for each month of his or her sentence,  the
period  of  estimated  actual  custody  is  ... years and ...
months.   If  the  defendant,  because  of  his  or  her  own
misconduct  or  failure  to  comply  with  the  institutional
regulations receives lesser credit, the actual time served in
prison will be longer."
    When a sentence of  imprisonment  is  imposed  for  first
degree  murder and the offense was committed on or after June
19,  1998,  the  judge's  statement,  to   be   given   after
pronouncing the sentence, shall include the following:
    "The purpose of this statement is to inform the public of
the  actual  period of time this defendant is likely to spend
in prison as a result of this sentence.  The actual period of
prison time served is determined by the statutes of  Illinois
as  applied  to  this  sentence by the Illinois Department of
Corrections and the Illinois Prisoner Review Board.  In  this
case,  the  defendant is not entitled to good conduct credit.
Therefore, this defendant will  serve  100%  of  his  or  her
sentence."
    (d)  When the defendant is committed to the Department of
Corrections,  the  State's Attorney shall and counsel for the
defendant may file a statement with the clerk of the court to
be transmitted to the department, agency  or  institution  to
which  the defendant is committed to furnish such department,
agency or institution with the facts and circumstances of the
offense for which the person was committed together with  all
other factual information accessible to them in regard to the
person  prior  to  his  commitment  relative  to  his habits,
associates, disposition and reputation and  any  other  facts
and  circumstances  which  may aid such department, agency or
institution during its custody of  such  person.   The  clerk
shall  within  10  days  after  receiving any such statements
transmit a copy to such department, agency or institution and
a copy to the other party, provided, however, that this shall
not be cause  for  delay  in  conveying  the  person  to  the
department,  agency  or  institution  to  which  he  has been
committed.
    (e)  The  clerk  of  the  court  shall  transmit  to  the
department, agency or  institution,  if  any,  to  which  the
defendant is committed, the following:
         (1)  the sentence imposed;
         (2)  any  statement  by  the  court of the basis for
    imposing the sentence;
         (3)  any presentence reports;
        (4)  the number of days, if any, which the defendant
    has been in custody and  for  which  he  is  entitled  to
    credit  against  the sentence, which information shall be
    provided to the clerk by the sheriff;
   
       
              (4.1)  any finding of great bodily harm made by  the
    court with respect to an offense enumerated in subsection
    (c-1);
         (5)  all  statements  filed  under subsection (d) of
    this Section;
         (6)  any  medical  or  mental  health   records   or
    summaries of the defendant;
         (7)  the   municipality  where  the  arrest  of  the
    offender or the commission of the offense  has  occurred,
    where  such  municipality  has  a population of more than
    25,000 persons;
         (8)  all statements made and evidence offered  under
    paragraph (7) of subsection (a) of this Section; and
         (9)  all  additional matters which the court directs
    the clerk to transmit.
(Source: P.A. 91-357,  eff.  7-29-99;  91-899,  eff.  1-1-01;
92-176, eff. 7-27-01; 92-806, eff. 1-1-03; revised 9-18-02.)



Effective Date: 01/01/04
Logged

~ "I have visited some of the best and the worst prisons and have never seen signs of coddling, but I have seen the terrible results of the boredom and frustration of empty hours and pointless existence." ~ US Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger

~ "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 »  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines

© 2006-2014 Illinois Prison Talk, All Rights Reserved
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM